[ **up: [[Fanfiction]]** ] > [!tip] Note: includes potentially NSFW content --- # Slash (Fiction) [[2025-0309. Jung (2004) sees in slash fiction ‘a communal grass roots critique not only of popular culture but also of heterosexual hegemonic notions of gender and sexuality’.|Jung (2004) sees in slash fiction ‘a communal grass roots critique not only of popular culture but also of heterosexual hegemonic notions of gender and sexuality’.]][^1] [[2025-0309. 'Bury (2005) also focuses her analysis on the queer pleasures and political potential of slash, yet the question of the appropriate gender-coding of slash characters is repeatedly brought up by her study participants.'|'Bury (2005) also focuses her analysis on the queer pleasures and political potential of slash, yet the question of the appropriate gender-coding of slash characters is repeatedly brought up by her study participants.']][^2] --- ## ↬ External resources - [Minotaur’s Sex Tips for Slash Writers](https://www.squidge.org/~minotaur/classic/eroc.html) [^1]: Milena Popova, ‘[[Popova. ‘“Dogfuck Rapeworld”_ Omegaverse Fanfiction as a Critical Tool in Analyzing the Impact of Social Power Structures on Intimate Relationships and Sexual Consent’, 2018.|"Dogfuck Rapeworld": Omegaverse Fanfiction as a Critical Tool in Analyzing the Impact of Social Power Structures on Intimate Relationships and Sexual Consent]]’, *Porn Studies* 5, no. 2 (3 April 2018), p. 11. [^2]: Milena Popova, ‘[[Popova. ‘“Dogfuck Rapeworld”_ Omegaverse Fanfiction as a Critical Tool in Analyzing the Impact of Social Power Structures on Intimate Relationships and Sexual Consent’, 2018.|"Dogfuck Rapeworld": Omegaverse Fanfiction as a Critical Tool in Analyzing the Impact of Social Power Structures on Intimate Relationships and Sexual Consent]]’, *Porn Studies* 5, no. 2 (3 April 2018), p. 11.